Climate Lead Thibaud Clisson takes a look at what came out of the recent COP26 climate conference and which initiatives investors should be keeping an eye on.
The gavel finally came down at COP26 a day after the conference was due to end (well, technically, a year after). Moments later, summit president Alok Sharma took to the podium and had to compose himself after a last-minute intervention from India and China to change the wording in the COP26 cover text to ‘phase down’ rather than ‘phase out’ coal.
His emotional response to changing a single word in the Glasgow Climate Pact highlights both the high stakes and political realities of such consensus-driven negotiations. In addition to the cover text, two weeks of talks resulted in changes to the Paris Agreement’s rulebook and a flurry of announcements and initiatives from countries and companies on climate change.
What are the most-important takeaways from COP26?
One of the main aims of the meeting was to finalise the ‘Paris rulebook’, originally to be agreed upon at COP25. Outstanding elements most notably included Article 6 on carbon markets.
COP 26 passed rules to establish a global carbon market and to facilitate bilateral carbon trading. A compromise was agreed between nations looking for a robust market that avoided any risk of emissions double-counting, and others looking to use older carbon credits from the Kyoto Protocol. Under the deal, credits extending back to 2013 can be traded between countries and used against national emissions reduction targets.
Transparency rules were agreed that will see all countries report their climate pledges and their progress towards these in a common format by 2024, allowing for easier comparability between climate plans. This agenda item survived despite significant pushback, although some low-emitting developing countries were given exemptions under the reporting rules.
To realise the ambition of the Glasgow Climate Pact and limit global warming to 1.5C means cutting emissions 45% by 2030 and to net zero by 2050. This is some way from being achieved: analysis from Climate Action Tracker puts the world on a 2.1-2.4C warming pathway accounting for existing pledges and targets (see Exhibit 1).
Parties have agreed to revisit their climate pledges – or nationally determined contributions (NDCs) – at COP27 with the aim of strengthening them by the end of 2022. This is a critical step in closing the emissions gap to 1.5C.
Glasgow saw countries agree, as part of the rulebook, to encourage other nations to set their NDCs in five-year periods beyond 2031. Many wanted the wording to be stronger here to force countries to use a five-year timetable.
From a financial perspective, countries agreed to phase out ‘inefficient’ fossil fuel subsidies. This, along with the specific reference to coal mentioned above, marks the first time fossil fuels have been specifically called out in a COP outcome text.
The Glasgow Climate Pact mentions for the first time the need to cut other greenhouse gases alongside CO2. In this regard, the Global Methane Pledge was signed by over 100 nations, notably without China, to reduce methane emissions 30% by 2030.
Another positive outcome was an announcement from the US and China that they would boost their climate cooperation over the next decade.
The Glasgow Climate Pact includes an explicit goal for developed countries to double their climate adaptation funding for developing countries by 2025 from 2019 levels, taking the annual figure to around USD 40 billion.
An additional USD 356 million was committed to the Adaptation Fund, and an important dialogue has been started on the contentious issue of ‘loss and damage’.
While this is all welcome progress, developed countries are still failing to meet their USD 100 billion per year climate financing commitment to emerging economies, which was supposed to have been reached in 2020. At Glasgow, nations now pledged to fully deliver on that goal by 2025.
The failure to reach the USD 100 billion, alongside providing broader adaptation support, shows the continued need to push for a just transition and highlights the role that private finance can play given the failure so far to reach the public investment levels needed to achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement.
This marks a clear call to action for private investors to help direct capital to where it is most needed in support of climate mitigation and adaptation.
Also watch the video with Thibaud Clisson on what happened at COP26
Any views expressed here are those of the author as of the date of publication, are based on available information, and are subject to change without notice. Individual portfolio management teams may hold different views and may take different investment decisions for different clients. The views expressed in this podcast do not in any way constitute investment advice.
The value of investments and the income they generate may go down as well as up and it is possible that investors will not recover their initial outlay. Past performance is no guarantee for future returns.
Investing in emerging markets, or specialised or restricted sectors is likely to be subject to a higher-than-average volatility due to a high degree of concentration, greater uncertainty because less information is available, there is less liquidity or due to greater sensitivity to changes in market conditions (social, political and economic conditions).
Some emerging markets offer less security than the majority of international developed markets. For this reason, services for portfolio transactions, liquidation and conservation on behalf of funds invested in emerging markets may carry greater risk.
This material is produced for information purposes only and does not constitute: 1. an offer to buy nor a solicitation to sell, nor shall it form the basis of or be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever or 2. investment advice. It does not have any regards to the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any person. Investors should seek independent professional advice before investing, or in the absence thereof, he/she should consider whether the investments are suitable for him/her.